<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: PwnageTool 2.0.1 Jailbreaks iPhone OS 2.0 &#8211; Properly (Updated)</title> <atom:link href="http://www.phonenews.com/pwnagetool-2.0.1-jailbreaks-iphone-os-2.0-properly-3773/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.phonenews.com/pwnagetool-2-0-1-jailbreaks-iphone-os-2-0-properly-3773/</link> <description>Providing complete coverage of the wireless industry, cell phone news, and future 4G technologies.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: BL39.bin BL46.bin PwnageTool, Download, and You &#124; PhoneNews.com Blog</title><link>http://www.phonenews.com/pwnagetool-2-0-1-jailbreaks-iphone-os-2-0-properly-3773/#comment-17235</link> <dc:creator>BL39.bin BL46.bin PwnageTool, Download, and You &#124; PhoneNews.com Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:37:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=3773#comment-17235</guid> <description>[...] It appears current events may have impacted this more than I thought. If you see the update to our PwnageTool 2.0.1 article, it&#8217;s pretty clear that the SIM unlocking process is unstable&#8230; and may brick your [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It appears current events may have impacted this more than I thought. If you see the update to our PwnageTool 2.0.1 article, it&#8217;s pretty clear that the SIM unlocking process is unstable&#8230; and may brick your [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Price</title><link>http://www.phonenews.com/pwnagetool-2-0-1-jailbreaks-iphone-os-2-0-properly-3773/#comment-17218</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Price</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:30:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=3773#comment-17218</guid> <description>Burton, the process which I posted in a comment (and not an article, was a suggestion to try for a user that was pulling their hair out). PwnageTool 2.0 did not consistently work... but it was certainly worth a try for someone that couldn&#039;t activate their iPhone.
And, that&#039;s especially since the need didn&#039;t involve SIM unlocking a first-gen iPhone, so the process would have been non-destructive. And, as PwnageTool&#039;s documentation says, you shouldn&#039;t SIM unlock your iPhone if you don&#039;t need to. That user didn&#039;t need to, so I made a personal suggestion for that specific situation.
Our &lt;b&gt;reporting&lt;/b&gt; clearly said that a jailbreak with PwnageTool 2.0 would fix the one instance where AT&amp;T SIMs would not work on an iPhone currently. We made no mention of SIM unlocking as we had not yet fully tested it. Now that we have, we caution users to do what we indicated previously... jailbreak, but don&#039;t unlock.
P.S. We never deleted a post about PwnageTool. I have no idea what you&#039;re talking about there...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Burton, the process which I posted in a comment (and not an article, was a suggestion to try for a user that was pulling their hair out). PwnageTool 2.0 did not consistently work&#8230; but it was certainly worth a try for someone that couldn&#8217;t activate their iPhone.</p><p>And, that&#8217;s especially since the need didn&#8217;t involve SIM unlocking a first-gen iPhone, so the process would have been non-destructive. And, as PwnageTool&#8217;s documentation says, you shouldn&#8217;t SIM unlock your iPhone if you don&#8217;t need to. That user didn&#8217;t need to, so I made a personal suggestion for that specific situation.</p><p>Our <b>reporting</b> clearly said that a jailbreak with PwnageTool 2.0 would fix the one instance where AT&#038;T SIMs would not work on an iPhone currently. We made no mention of SIM unlocking as we had not yet fully tested it. Now that we have, we caution users to do what we indicated previously&#8230; jailbreak, but don&#8217;t unlock.</p><p>P.S. We never deleted a post about PwnageTool. I have no idea what you&#8217;re talking about there&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: burton1976</title><link>http://www.phonenews.com/pwnagetool-2-0-1-jailbreaks-iphone-os-2-0-properly-3773/#comment-17214</link> <dc:creator>burton1976</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:20:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=3773#comment-17214</guid> <description>First off, you did report on the Pwnage Tool just a few days ago when you tried to include it in your ill-fated attempt to be the first at getting an iPhone 3G on prepaid - you know you were gunning for the stature, not to help the consumer.  You made mention of Pwnage as if it were the keystone of your &quot;trick&quot;.
Secondly, Chris...you&#039;re hilarious...and you know that in the blogging world it&#039;s bad manners to delete an entire post when you **** up - and that&#039;s EXACTLY what you did.  I&#039;m sure you wanted to delete and start over once you posted your holier than thou rant above.  You spent the entire post ranting about how you guys sat back and waited until Pwnage Tool worked and how your crack team of tech dorks was not part of the &quot;fools rush in&quot; party.  Well guess what?  You and your team are the fools, you did rush in and you now have lost all credibility with me - and hopefully a lot of other people that used to visit this site religiously will do the same.  I will still be back to read, when Engadget Mobile or BGR point me to your second rate website for laughs, and I will definitely not come back for any real information.  I will be back solely to laugh and ponder exactly what it is like when &quot;fools rush in&quot;.  Congrats on bricking your phone!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, you did report on the Pwnage Tool just a few days ago when you tried to include it in your ill-fated attempt to be the first at getting an iPhone 3G on prepaid &#8211; you know you were gunning for the stature, not to help the consumer.  You made mention of Pwnage as if it were the keystone of your &#8220;trick&#8221;.</p><p>Secondly, Chris&#8230;you&#8217;re hilarious&#8230;and you know that in the blogging world it&#8217;s bad manners to delete an entire post when you **** up &#8211; and that&#8217;s EXACTLY what you did.  I&#8217;m sure you wanted to delete and start over once you posted your holier than thou rant above.  You spent the entire post ranting about how you guys sat back and waited until Pwnage Tool worked and how your crack team of tech dorks was not part of the &#8220;fools rush in&#8221; party.  Well guess what?  You and your team are the fools, you did rush in and you now have lost all credibility with me &#8211; and hopefully a lot of other people that used to visit this site religiously will do the same.  I will still be back to read, when Engadget Mobile or BGR point me to your second rate website for laughs, and I will definitely not come back for any real information.  I will be back solely to laugh and ponder exactly what it is like when &#8220;fools rush in&#8221;.  Congrats on bricking your phone!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PwnageTool? What&#8217;s going on&#8230; &#124; PhoneNews.com Blog</title><link>http://www.phonenews.com/pwnagetool-2-0-1-jailbreaks-iphone-os-2-0-properly-3773/#comment-17194</link> <dc:creator>PwnageTool? What&#8217;s going on&#8230; &#124; PhoneNews.com Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:53:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=3773#comment-17194</guid> <description>[...] Got a workaround, see the post for details&#8230;   Trackback &#124; Permalink [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Got a workaround, see the post for details&#8230;   Trackback | Permalink [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
