Comments on: RIM Officially Announces the BlackBerry Bold 9000 Series http://www.phonenews.com/rim-officially-announces-the-blackberry-bold-9000-series-3426/ Providing complete coverage of the wireless industry, cell phone news, and future 4G technologies. Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:37:00 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Humberto Saabedra http://www.phonenews.com/rim-officially-announces-the-blackberry-bold-9000-series-3426/comment-page-1/#comment-13375 Humberto Saabedra Mon, 12 May 2008 21:19:38 +0000 http://www.phonenews.com/?p=3426#comment-13375 Being that AT&T will have an exclusive on the device for the time being, I don't doubt that there will be a version for T-Mobile featuring 1700Mhz support down the road. As of now however, unless RIM comes out with an official statement, I'd consider that a rumor for now until relevant FCC documents pop up. As far as <strong>this</strong> version supporting 1700Mhz 3G, I didn't see anything that alluded to it that supports the claim made by Boy Genius. If it wasn't in the press release, its a pretty safe bet it's not on the device Being that AT&T will have an exclusive on the device for the time being, I don’t doubt that there will be a version for T-Mobile featuring 1700Mhz support down the road. As of now however, unless RIM comes out with an official statement, I’d consider that a rumor for now until relevant FCC documents pop up.

As far as this version supporting 1700Mhz 3G, I didn’t see anything that alluded to it that supports the claim made by Boy Genius. If it wasn’t in the press release, its a pretty safe bet it’s not on the device

]]> By: Daniel http://www.phonenews.com/rim-officially-announces-the-blackberry-bold-9000-series-3426/comment-page-1/#comment-13373 Daniel Mon, 12 May 2008 20:27:38 +0000 http://www.phonenews.com/?p=3426#comment-13373 According to BoyGenius, this device will also sport the 1700 MHz 3G band for T-Mobile. Do your sources deny that? Thanks. According to BoyGenius, this device will also sport the 1700 MHz 3G band for T-Mobile. Do your sources deny that?

Thanks.

]]>