<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sprint ETF Settlement a Raw Deal for Consumers: How you can (easily) fight back (Updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-etf-settlement-a-raw-deal-for-consumers-how-you-can-easily-fight-back.-6057/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-etf-settlement-a-raw-deal-for-consumers-how-you-can-easily-fight-back.-6057/</link>
	<description>Providing complete coverage of the wireless industry, cell phone news, and future 4G technologies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:36:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Price</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-etf-settlement-a-raw-deal-for-consumers-how-you-can-easily-fight-back.-6057/comment-page-1/#comment-30503</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=6057#comment-30503</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re explanation of the situation gives little for me to go on, but when you pay part of a debt, that can be legally interpreted as an agreement to the entire debt. You may be stuck paying it off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re explanation of the situation gives little for me to go on, but when you pay part of a debt, that can be legally interpreted as an agreement to the entire debt. You may be stuck paying it off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dora Greer</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-etf-settlement-a-raw-deal-for-consumers-how-you-can-easily-fight-back.-6057/comment-page-1/#comment-30491</link>
		<dc:creator>Dora Greer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=6057#comment-30491</guid>
		<description>I was charges  $ 200.00 cancellation fee
reason fo cancllation no service when we wenton vaation, and Sprint comfirmes  they did not service  Rosehill, Va
I have alrasy paid them $100.00

Comments and advise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was charges  $ 200.00 cancellation fee<br />
reason fo cancllation no service when we wenton vaation, and Sprint comfirmes  they did not service  Rosehill, Va<br />
I have alrasy paid them $100.00</p>
<p>Comments and advise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-etf-settlement-a-raw-deal-for-consumers-how-you-can-easily-fight-back.-6057/comment-page-1/#comment-30466</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=6057#comment-30466</guid>
		<description>i was forced into paying $125 early termination fee when a year was unknowingly added in the middle of my 2 year contract,making it three years . I was told, after arguing and calling the better buisness bureau ,it was bieng investigated ,and taking my individual case further would cost much more than the $125. I am no longer a sprint user so i would not need any sprint coupons only a check will do even  $90.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was forced into paying $125 early termination fee when a year was unknowingly added in the middle of my 2 year contract,making it three years . I was told, after arguing and calling the better buisness bureau ,it was bieng investigated ,and taking my individual case further would cost much more than the $125. I am no longer a sprint user so i would not need any sprint coupons only a check will do even  $90.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allyson</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-etf-settlement-a-raw-deal-for-consumers-how-you-can-easily-fight-back.-6057/comment-page-1/#comment-30372</link>
		<dc:creator>Allyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=6057#comment-30372</guid>
		<description>The settlement site still (or perhaps again) includes the statement, &quot;Please do not call or write to Sprint Nextel, their attorneys or the Court regarding this settlement,&quot; at both the top and bottom of the home page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The settlement site still (or perhaps again) includes the statement, &#8220;Please do not call or write to Sprint Nextel, their attorneys or the Court regarding this settlement,&#8221; at both the top and bottom of the home page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-etf-settlement-a-raw-deal-for-consumers-how-you-can-easily-fight-back.-6057/comment-page-1/#comment-30072</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=6057#comment-30072</guid>
		<description>The funny thing is no one is seeing the other side of this agruement. Early terms were created to stop unscrupulous people from getting discounted phones, stopping thier service and just turning around and selling them for profit. 

Phone carriers do not manufacture the phones for thier service so they do not just simple get them for free to give to customers. Just like your cable company does not make TVs to use with thier cable service. So in the end its the few that screw it up for the rest of us because the same people who complained they were forced to sign a contract will be the same people complaining that they now have to pay full retail price for phones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funny thing is no one is seeing the other side of this agruement. Early terms were created to stop unscrupulous people from getting discounted phones, stopping thier service and just turning around and selling them for profit. </p>
<p>Phone carriers do not manufacture the phones for thier service so they do not just simple get them for free to give to customers. Just like your cable company does not make TVs to use with thier cable service. So in the end its the few that screw it up for the rest of us because the same people who complained they were forced to sign a contract will be the same people complaining that they now have to pay full retail price for phones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-etf-settlement-a-raw-deal-for-consumers-how-you-can-easily-fight-back.-6057/comment-page-1/#comment-24561</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=6057#comment-24561</guid>
		<description>Does the settlement only provide $90 for the entire account cancellation? Because we were charged $850 for canceling 4 lines of service. To make a long story short, several reps told us the contract date was different than it was supposed to be(which we have e-mails confirming this) and when we canceled our account they denied what the reps had told us. We then said we&#039;re not paying for it because we have these e-mails confirming it. They then told us they were going to turn us over the creditors and ruin our credit, so we paid them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the settlement only provide $90 for the entire account cancellation? Because we were charged $850 for canceling 4 lines of service. To make a long story short, several reps told us the contract date was different than it was supposed to be(which we have e-mails confirming this) and when we canceled our account they denied what the reps had told us. We then said we&#8217;re not paying for it because we have these e-mails confirming it. They then told us they were going to turn us over the creditors and ruin our credit, so we paid them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Assualted Intern</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-etf-settlement-a-raw-deal-for-consumers-how-you-can-easily-fight-back.-6057/comment-page-1/#comment-24487</link>
		<dc:creator>Assualted Intern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=6057#comment-24487</guid>
		<description>The 2nd complaint was filed on  the 4th of Decemebr.  On December 5, 2008, the Court preliminarily approved the Settlement.  How the f is that possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2nd complaint was filed on  the 4th of Decemebr.  On December 5, 2008, the Court preliminarily approved the Settlement.  How the f is that possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wicked Monkey</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-etf-settlement-a-raw-deal-for-consumers-how-you-can-easily-fight-back.-6057/comment-page-1/#comment-24486</link>
		<dc:creator>Wicked Monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=6057#comment-24486</guid>
		<description>went on settlement website, it state that the case was done through mediation or arbitration with some former judge Politan.  James Cecchi according to the website of Carell Byrne bain worked for this former judge at some point.    This Cecchi dude has his wife working in the same court house wehre the case is settled and has a former boss working on the settlment.  Nice gig.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>went on settlement website, it state that the case was done through mediation or arbitration with some former judge Politan.  James Cecchi according to the website of Carell Byrne bain worked for this former judge at some point.    This Cecchi dude has his wife working in the same court house wehre the case is settled and has a former boss working on the settlment.  Nice gig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cohn Helmut</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-etf-settlement-a-raw-deal-for-consumers-how-you-can-easily-fight-back.-6057/comment-page-1/#comment-24485</link>
		<dc:creator>Cohn Helmut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=6057#comment-24485</guid>
		<description>Class Counsel at Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi, Stewart &amp; Olstein, Attn: Sprint ETF Settlement, 5 Becker Farm Road, Roseland, New Jersey 07068

James Cecchi, the attorney of the case who apparently settled with Sprint.  His wife works as a magistrate judge in the court wehre the case was settled.  According to Google, she has worked on several cases with Judge Linares.  

Make your own conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Class Counsel at Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi, Stewart &amp; Olstein, Attn: Sprint ETF Settlement, 5 Becker Farm Road, Roseland, New Jersey 07068</p>
<p>James Cecchi, the attorney of the case who apparently settled with Sprint.  His wife works as a magistrate judge in the court wehre the case was settled.  According to Google, she has worked on several cases with Judge Linares.  </p>
<p>Make your own conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cohn Helmut</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-etf-settlement-a-raw-deal-for-consumers-how-you-can-easily-fight-back.-6057/comment-page-1/#comment-24484</link>
		<dc:creator>Cohn Helmut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=6057#comment-24484</guid>
		<description>Class action attorney Paul Weiss faces charges of assault and battery by 
three women who worked at his Chicago law firm, Freed &amp; Weiss, according to 
a complaint filed against him by the Illinois Attorney Registration and 
Discipline Commission (ARDC).

Weiss was suspended by the Illinois Supreme Court in 1997 for making obscene 
phone calls to several women, including a minor whom he&#039;d seen at a high 
school volleyball game.

The new complaint was entered Dec. 4 -- the same day a New Jersey court gave 
preliminary approval to a Sprint class action settlement in which Weiss, 
class counsel, stands to share $4.6 million in attorneys&#039; fees.

Weiss, whose firm has been among the most active class action counsel in 
Madison and St. Clair counties, is alleged to have violated the Illinois 
Rules of Professional Conduct. The allegations, according to the complaint 
amended on Jan. 5, include:


a.. In the summer of 2003, he approached an 18-year-old file clerk who &quot;was 
walking down the hall dressed in a khaki skirt and black shirt. Respondent 
came up behind her, said &#039;you look great,&#039; and then grabbed her buttocks and 
said, &#039;I just wanted you to know that.&#039;&quot;


a.. The file clerk was the half-sister of a legal assistant employed at the 
firm, who claims that in her first week of employment in 2001, at age 19, 
Weiss allegedly &quot;brought her into a new office space, stood extremely close 
to her, and made a comment to her about wanting to kiss her.&quot;

The complaint itemizes several instances of alleged assault and battery, as 
well as instances of repeated telephone harassment. It also states, &quot;At some 
time after January 7, 2003, Respondent cornered (legal assistant) while she 
was on her way to the office restroom.

&quot;Respondent then forced (legal assistant) into a stairwell where he 
attempted to kiss her. Respondent grabbed (legal assistant&#039;s) breasts, 
touched her vagina over her clothing and attempted to put his hand down her 
pants. When (legal assistant) resisted Respondent&#039;s advances, Respondent 
exposed himself and masturbated until he ejaculated on the stairwell wall. 
During this incident, (legal assistant) repeatedly requested that he release 
her and stop what he was doing.&quot;


a.. An associate attorney hired in 2002 claims she was terminated at the end 
of her first year after rebuffing Weiss&#039;s advances.
&quot;On September 13, 2002, Respondent entered (associate&#039;s) office to discuss a 
legal matter. Respondent then interjected, &#039;You know, you need to start 
coming in here wearing some low-cut (expletive) because sex sells.&#039; 
(Associate) replied with disgust, that sex had nothing to do with work.&quot;

The ARDC claims Weiss has engaged in misconduct by committing criminal acts 
and has engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and 
which tends to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute.

Jerome Larkin, ARDC administrator, and his counsel, Wendy Muchman, have 
asked the matter be assigned to a hearing board panel, that a hearing be 
held, and that a recommendation for discipline be made as warranted.

Court records related to Weiss&#039;s 1997 suspension indicated that he had been 
diagnosed with a mental condition called telephone scatologia, a psychiatric 
disorder characterized by a recurrent urge or fantasy to make obscene 
telephone calls.

His suspension lasted 30 days and he was placed on probation by the ARDC for 
two years. Weiss moved to Seattle and practiced law there while his 
punishment was meted out in Illinois.

Weiss resumed practice in Illinois in 1998, where he began securing large 
verdicts and settlements as co-lead counsel on several class-action suits in 
Madison County with Brad Lakin of the Lakin Law Firm.

But the firms had a falling out in 2006 and filed suits and counter suits 
over control of class actions.

Last year, the Lakin Law Firm settled a Madison County suit against Freed 
and Weiss, and Freed and Weiss settled a Cook County suit against the Lakin 
firm.

But the detente was short-lived as the two firms recently renewed their 
battle over competing Sprint class actions.

Two days after taking office, Madison County Circuit Judge Dennis Ruth 
denied Lakin&#039;s emergency motion for a restraining order against Freed &amp; 
Weiss and Sprint involving the New Jersey class action.

At a Dec. 3 hearing, Ruth played referee between Lakin and Richard Burke, 
who teamed with Freed &amp; Weiss after Lakin fired him.

The new judge inherited the case from retiring judge Nicholas Byron, who 
certified a national class action against Sprint and appointed Lakin&#039;s firm 
as class counsel.

--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Class action attorney Paul Weiss faces charges of assault and battery by<br />
three women who worked at his Chicago law firm, Freed &amp; Weiss, according to<br />
a complaint filed against him by the Illinois Attorney Registration and<br />
Discipline Commission (ARDC).</p>
<p>Weiss was suspended by the Illinois Supreme Court in 1997 for making obscene<br />
phone calls to several women, including a minor whom he&#8217;d seen at a high<br />
school volleyball game.</p>
<p>The new complaint was entered Dec. 4 &#8212; the same day a New Jersey court gave<br />
preliminary approval to a Sprint class action settlement in which Weiss,<br />
class counsel, stands to share $4.6 million in attorneys&#8217; fees.</p>
<p>Weiss, whose firm has been among the most active class action counsel in<br />
Madison and St. Clair counties, is alleged to have violated the Illinois<br />
Rules of Professional Conduct. The allegations, according to the complaint<br />
amended on Jan. 5, include:</p>
<p>a.. In the summer of 2003, he approached an 18-year-old file clerk who &#8220;was<br />
walking down the hall dressed in a khaki skirt and black shirt. Respondent<br />
came up behind her, said &#8216;you look great,&#8217; and then grabbed her buttocks and<br />
said, &#8216;I just wanted you to know that.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>a.. The file clerk was the half-sister of a legal assistant employed at the<br />
firm, who claims that in her first week of employment in 2001, at age 19,<br />
Weiss allegedly &#8220;brought her into a new office space, stood extremely close<br />
to her, and made a comment to her about wanting to kiss her.&#8221;</p>
<p>The complaint itemizes several instances of alleged assault and battery, as<br />
well as instances of repeated telephone harassment. It also states, &#8220;At some<br />
time after January 7, 2003, Respondent cornered (legal assistant) while she<br />
was on her way to the office restroom.</p>
<p>&#8220;Respondent then forced (legal assistant) into a stairwell where he<br />
attempted to kiss her. Respondent grabbed (legal assistant&#8217;s) breasts,<br />
touched her vagina over her clothing and attempted to put his hand down her<br />
pants. When (legal assistant) resisted Respondent&#8217;s advances, Respondent<br />
exposed himself and masturbated until he ejaculated on the stairwell wall.<br />
During this incident, (legal assistant) repeatedly requested that he release<br />
her and stop what he was doing.&#8221;</p>
<p>a.. An associate attorney hired in 2002 claims she was terminated at the end<br />
of her first year after rebuffing Weiss&#8217;s advances.<br />
&#8220;On September 13, 2002, Respondent entered (associate&#8217;s) office to discuss a<br />
legal matter. Respondent then interjected, &#8216;You know, you need to start<br />
coming in here wearing some low-cut (expletive) because sex sells.&#8217;<br />
(Associate) replied with disgust, that sex had nothing to do with work.&#8221;</p>
<p>The ARDC claims Weiss has engaged in misconduct by committing criminal acts<br />
and has engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and<br />
which tends to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute.</p>
<p>Jerome Larkin, ARDC administrator, and his counsel, Wendy Muchman, have<br />
asked the matter be assigned to a hearing board panel, that a hearing be<br />
held, and that a recommendation for discipline be made as warranted.</p>
<p>Court records related to Weiss&#8217;s 1997 suspension indicated that he had been<br />
diagnosed with a mental condition called telephone scatologia, a psychiatric<br />
disorder characterized by a recurrent urge or fantasy to make obscene<br />
telephone calls.</p>
<p>His suspension lasted 30 days and he was placed on probation by the ARDC for<br />
two years. Weiss moved to Seattle and practiced law there while his<br />
punishment was meted out in Illinois.</p>
<p>Weiss resumed practice in Illinois in 1998, where he began securing large<br />
verdicts and settlements as co-lead counsel on several class-action suits in<br />
Madison County with Brad Lakin of the Lakin Law Firm.</p>
<p>But the firms had a falling out in 2006 and filed suits and counter suits<br />
over control of class actions.</p>
<p>Last year, the Lakin Law Firm settled a Madison County suit against Freed<br />
and Weiss, and Freed and Weiss settled a Cook County suit against the Lakin<br />
firm.</p>
<p>But the detente was short-lived as the two firms recently renewed their<br />
battle over competing Sprint class actions.</p>
<p>Two days after taking office, Madison County Circuit Judge Dennis Ruth<br />
denied Lakin&#8217;s emergency motion for a restraining order against Freed &amp;<br />
Weiss and Sprint involving the New Jersey class action.</p>
<p>At a Dec. 3 hearing, Ruth played referee between Lakin and Richard Burke,<br />
who teamed with Freed &amp; Weiss after Lakin fired him.</p>
<p>The new judge inherited the case from retiring judge Nicholas Byron, who<br />
certified a national class action against Sprint and appointed Lakin&#8217;s firm<br />
as class counsel.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
