<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sprint Pre Homebrew Not Dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-pre-homebrew-not-dead-8328/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-pre-homebrew-not-dead-8328/</link>
	<description>Providing complete coverage of the wireless industry, cell phone news, and future 4G technologies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:27:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Price</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-pre-homebrew-not-dead-8328/comment-page-1/#comment-28947</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-pre-homebrew-not-dead-8328/#comment-28947</guid>
		<description>I disagree with trying to make that academic distinction. Self-signing is code not signed by any certifying authority and thus is &quot;unsigned&quot; as considered in the industry.

If Apple let anyone self-sign a .app, the word &quot;jailbreak&quot; wouldn&#039;t have entered the 3G lexicon.

Self-signing is still unsigned code in the OHA&#039;s view, Apple&#039;s view, and in the view of PhoneNews.com. I suspect Palm would agree with such statements if asked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with trying to make that academic distinction. Self-signing is code not signed by any certifying authority and thus is &#8220;unsigned&#8221; as considered in the industry.</p>
<p>If Apple let anyone self-sign a .app, the word &#8220;jailbreak&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t have entered the 3G lexicon.</p>
<p>Self-signing is still unsigned code in the OHA&#8217;s view, Apple&#8217;s view, and in the view of PhoneNews.com. I suspect Palm would agree with such statements if asked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-pre-homebrew-not-dead-8328/comment-page-1/#comment-28940</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/sprint-pre-homebrew-not-dead-8328/#comment-28940</guid>
		<description>Actually from what is being said (not ready to test it myself yet) it doesn&#039;t only effect unsigned applications. Part of the process of creating the .ipk file is to package it and sign it. 

http://predev.wikidot.com/installing-apps-without-rooting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually from what is being said (not ready to test it myself yet) it doesn&#8217;t only effect unsigned applications. Part of the process of creating the .ipk file is to package it and sign it. </p>
<p><a href="http://predev.wikidot.com/installing-apps-without-rooting" rel="nofollow">http://predev.wikidot.com/installing-apps-without-rooting</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
