Comments on: Sprint’s Samsung SPH-Z700 Dies a Quiet Death

By: Don Louie

Don Louie — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:10:33 +0000

The Moto is the best CDMA ptt phone phone out if you can get part the 4 hour standby and no NFL Mobile Live, I couldn’t

By: Don Louie

Don Louie — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:39:09 +0000

So far my v950 is ok, I want something a lot more handsome and the z700 was slightly that

By: cj

cj — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:58:05 +0000

ya i had a moto k1m before the touch and i LOVED that phone despite the terrible battery life (after the 1st firmware upgrade). i was checking sprints lineup and am disappointed to see they no longer offer the k1m or the k9m which was almost $500 just a few months ago. at least theres ebay but theres always the danger of it being used or worse broken. anyways enjoy your moto!

By: cj

cj — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:53:16 +0000

simply everyting: $69.99 – 450 minutes, data, messaging, navigation
nationwide premium: $79.99 – 450 minutes, data, messaging, navigation
tmobile: $59.99 – 1,000 minutes, data

thats what i found for bundled plans. if sprint is cheaper and better wouldnt people be flocking to sprint rather than 1.09 million people leaving in 3 months. you get about the same for your money. its that simple. even if you claim sprint is a bit faster but being able to use unlocked phones of your choice rather than waiting around hoping your carrier releases a bastardized version such as the n95 that has a 5 mp camera might make it even to most people. im not assuming what phone you have, you mentioned that you bought a moto for $130 which is entry level not me.

By: Don Louie

Don Louie — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:04:09 +0000

CJ, wherever your info saying Sprint isn’t cheaper is false once factoring data, nav and messaging. Now I will state some facts that all can look up as follows: att has 3g but faster 3g isn’t in as many places as Sprint, Tmo just got in the 3g biz, SERO, SE plus and even SE are better values than other because of data, nav, messaging, tv and radio. You are making an @$$ of yourself by assuming what plan and phone I use is cheap because of my post. I’m really hoping more highend ptt phones like the v950 come out though, the Moto is growing on me (because of functionality not looks)

By: cj

cj — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:41:40 +0000

don louie, you came back into this mess with that sprint is cheaper and better than everyone else and you mentioned that i have sero and will be paying more. i did a comparison and of course you ignored it completely since it shows sprint does not offer more for $40 a month. but i do agree with you, sprint USED to be cheaper than other carriers. if you didnt want to get involved you shouldnt have mentioned me or my sero plan. youre right i dont know exactly what you have but judging from your comments and choice of threads, you are in the market for a $130 bottom entry level phone. you definately arent an instinct and simply everything guy so its safe to say you probably didnt have multiple services with multiple carriers. if metro and cricket are not on sprints level, why even bring them up to begin with? at least they didnt lose $253 million in three months.

By: cj

cj — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:28:28 +0000

nice way of backtracking bottomline you silly registered sex offender you! if you want criticizing check the iphones at best buy thread… but i guess when sprint fans do the criticizing its ok to you. how have i criticized sprint? did i say their reception is bad? or did i say they are overcharging? im merely pointing out their failures that you mentioned are public knowledge despite fanboys such as yourself overlooking them completely and saying sprint is without question the best carrier. we can go back and forth about opinion but at the end of the day, sprints failures are proof that they aren’t by far the best service at the best price (i did a comparison earlier). since you are obviously in your 40’s with the iq of a retarded toddler i will spell it out for you once more. sprint is not a bad carrier. nor are they vastly superior. they are on par with att, tmobile and verizon. thats all

By: Don Louie

Don Louie — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:14:27 +0000

I would like to see more devices soon, other than that Moto

By: Don Louie

Don Louie — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:15:22 +0000

I never have used magenta and all those instances where I mentioned Cricket and Leap (same thing) I meant to put Metro PCS there for Cricket. I have experience with them too

By: Don Louie

Don Louie — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:08:42 +0000

CJ you don’t know what service I use, don’t put me in your argument with another guy. Tmobile doesn’t have enough 3g coverage, Cricket and Leap have regional and not all of the 12 to 20 markets have 3g (speaking from experience), att isn’t there with 3g either (look it up) vzw is toe to toe and may have more DOrA than Sprint. I digress, this is about ptt devices. CJ, I made no comment on your plan, device or carrier in particular so leave me out that mess because I interjected opinions with some facts