<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T-Mobile Eliminates $18 Upgrade Fee Based on Customer Feedback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phonenews.com/t-mobile-eliminates-18-upgrade-fee-based-on-customer-feedback-5890/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phonenews.com/t-mobile-eliminates-18-upgrade-fee-based-on-customer-feedback-5890/</link>
	<description>Providing complete coverage of the wireless industry, cell phone news, and future 4G technologies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:37:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Mobile Quietly Brings Back $18 Upgrade Fee &#124; PhoneNews.com</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/t-mobile-eliminates-18-upgrade-fee-based-on-customer-feedback-5890/comment-page-1/#comment-27143</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Mobile Quietly Brings Back $18 Upgrade Fee &#124; PhoneNews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=5890#comment-27143</guid>
		<description>[...] had eliminated the unecessary fee in December according to feedback the company received directly and indirectly, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had eliminated the unecessary fee in December according to feedback the company received directly and indirectly, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/t-mobile-eliminates-18-upgrade-fee-based-on-customer-feedback-5890/comment-page-1/#comment-23773</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=5890#comment-23773</guid>
		<description>No question the upgrade fees serve as a revenue generator for the carrier, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No question the upgrade fees serve as a revenue generator for the carrier, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Louie</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/t-mobile-eliminates-18-upgrade-fee-based-on-customer-feedback-5890/comment-page-1/#comment-23694</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Louie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=5890#comment-23694</guid>
		<description>True dat, making a customer pay a fee on top of the purchase price is plum dumb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True dat, making a customer pay a fee on top of the purchase price is plum dumb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mustang46L</title>
		<link>http://www.phonenews.com/t-mobile-eliminates-18-upgrade-fee-based-on-customer-feedback-5890/comment-page-1/#comment-23692</link>
		<dc:creator>Mustang46L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=5890#comment-23692</guid>
		<description>Now hopefully the other carriers follow suit. An upgrade fee is the most ludicrous thing ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now hopefully the other carriers follow suit. An upgrade fee is the most ludicrous thing ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
