<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Verizon FOTA Issues Persist, Customer Council Objects, FCC PSAP Concerns</title> <atom:link href="http://www.phonenews.com/verizon-fota-issues-persist-customer-council-objects-fcc-psaps-concerned-5250/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.phonenews.com/verizon-fota-issues-persist-customer-council-objects-fcc-psaps-concerned-5250/</link> <description>Providing complete coverage of the wireless industry, cell phone news, and future 4G technologies.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Rocky</title><link>http://www.phonenews.com/verizon-fota-issues-persist-customer-council-objects-fcc-psaps-concerned-5250/#comment-37231</link> <dc:creator>Rocky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 05:10:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=5250#comment-37231</guid> <description>Yeah take that</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah take that</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AT&#38;T Hiring Investigators to Snoop on PhoneNews.com? &#124; PhoneNews.com</title><link>http://www.phonenews.com/verizon-fota-issues-persist-customer-council-objects-fcc-psaps-concerned-5250/#comment-34514</link> <dc:creator>AT&#38;T Hiring Investigators to Snoop on PhoneNews.com? &#124; PhoneNews.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:03:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=5250#comment-34514</guid> <description>[...] Understandable, but not very objective. AT&amp;T only needs to note that we pursued Verizon last year over dangerous firmware updates. The result? They blackballed us from their think tank, but we moved on. AT&amp;T doesn&#8217;t [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Understandable, but not very objective. AT&amp;T only needs to note that we pursued Verizon last year over dangerous firmware updates. The result? They blackballed us from their think tank, but we moved on. AT&amp;T doesn&#8217;t [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LG enV Touch and enV3 Updated, LG Software Update App Available &#124; PhoneNews.com</title><link>http://www.phonenews.com/verizon-fota-issues-persist-customer-council-objects-fcc-psaps-concerned-5250/#comment-28988</link> <dc:creator>LG enV Touch and enV3 Updated, LG Software Update App Available &#124; PhoneNews.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:16:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=5250#comment-28988</guid> <description>[...] the wake of Verizon&#8217;s dangerous and legally-questionable firmware over-the-air implementation, LG has launched their own LG Software Update application. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the wake of Verizon&#8217;s dangerous and legally-questionable firmware over-the-air implementation, LG has launched their own LG Software Update application. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Are Palm&#8217;s Forced Pre Updates Illegal? (Yeah, they probably are) &#124; CentralGadget.com</title><link>http://www.phonenews.com/verizon-fota-issues-persist-customer-council-objects-fcc-psaps-concerned-5250/#comment-28523</link> <dc:creator>Are Palm&#8217;s Forced Pre Updates Illegal? (Yeah, they probably are) &#124; CentralGadget.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:31:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=5250#comment-28523</guid> <description>[...] Wireless late last year stopped all forced FOTA updates on their devices, after PhoneNews.com publicly detailed the dangers, risks, [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wireless late last year stopped all forced FOTA updates on their devices, after PhoneNews.com publicly detailed the dangers, risks, [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Are Palm&#8217;s Forced Pre Updates Illegal? (Yeah, they probably are) &#124; PhoneNews.com</title><link>http://www.phonenews.com/verizon-fota-issues-persist-customer-council-objects-fcc-psaps-concerned-5250/#comment-28512</link> <dc:creator>Are Palm&#8217;s Forced Pre Updates Illegal? (Yeah, they probably are) &#124; PhoneNews.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:27:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=5250#comment-28512</guid> <description>[...] Wireless late last year stopped all forced FOTA updates on their devices, after PhoneNews.com publicly detailed the dangers, risks, [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wireless late last year stopped all forced FOTA updates on their devices, after PhoneNews.com publicly detailed the dangers, risks, [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Al</title><link>http://www.phonenews.com/verizon-fota-issues-persist-customer-council-objects-fcc-psaps-concerned-5250/#comment-24400</link> <dc:creator>Al</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:46:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=5250#comment-24400</guid> <description>All it will take is for one such person to be stranded upon one such mountain with one such bricked phone and the resulting lawsuit would put a swift end to this reprehensible practice (and hopefully a large dent in avaricious Verizon&#039;s purse).
For anyone with a single functioning neuron in their skull (unfortunately that rules out the majority of the U.S. population, which is why such insanity is allowed to go unchallenged), there can be no question at all that this practice should be illegal. It is an outrage. Basically, these corporations are saying &quot;you paid for the phone, but we still claim ownership of the phone and can do anything we want to it without your knowledge or consent&quot;. (I am of course referring to phones that are not on a contract and were purchased full-retail, unlocked, where there is no question of ownership).
Only in America, where the government is the dutiful servant of corporations. And where the sheeple bend over and beg for more because they are brainwashed into thinking it&#039;s in their best interest! Incredible.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All it will take is for one such person to be stranded upon one such mountain with one such bricked phone and the resulting lawsuit would put a swift end to this reprehensible practice (and hopefully a large dent in avaricious Verizon&#8217;s purse).</p><p>For anyone with a single functioning neuron in their skull (unfortunately that rules out the majority of the U.S. population, which is why such insanity is allowed to go unchallenged), there can be no question at all that this practice should be illegal. It is an outrage. Basically, these corporations are saying &#8220;you paid for the phone, but we still claim ownership of the phone and can do anything we want to it without your knowledge or consent&#8221;. (I am of course referring to phones that are not on a contract and were purchased full-retail, unlocked, where there is no question of ownership).</p><p>Only in America, where the government is the dutiful servant of corporations. And where the sheeple bend over and beg for more because they are brainwashed into thinking it&#8217;s in their best interest! Incredible.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: We Did It: Verizon to Unlock GPS on Windows Mobile &#124; PhoneNews.com</title><link>http://www.phonenews.com/verizon-fota-issues-persist-customer-council-objects-fcc-psaps-concerned-5250/#comment-23635</link> <dc:creator>We Did It: Verizon to Unlock GPS on Windows Mobile &#124; PhoneNews.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:26:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=5250#comment-23635</guid> <description>[...] spotlighted the need for Verizon to reform on GPS. We just hope they will do the same on their legally dubious forced firmware updates, which can leave you trapped on a mountain&#8230; with a paperweight for a phone to call for help.  [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] spotlighted the need for Verizon to reform on GPS. We just hope they will do the same on their legally dubious forced firmware updates, which can leave you trapped on a mountain&#8230; with a paperweight for a phone to call for help.  [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jamey</title><link>http://www.phonenews.com/verizon-fota-issues-persist-customer-council-objects-fcc-psaps-concerned-5250/#comment-23280</link> <dc:creator>jamey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:16:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=5250#comment-23280</guid> <description>when dialing 911 all phones ignore the prl and use any signal available to the phone regardless of which company it belongs to.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when dialing 911 all phones ignore the prl and use any signal available to the phone regardless of which company it belongs to.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian</title><link>http://www.phonenews.com/verizon-fota-issues-persist-customer-council-objects-fcc-psaps-concerned-5250/#comment-23278</link> <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:22:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=5250#comment-23278</guid> <description>Hey Chris...Here is one for you, which I have heard through rumors and I can not confirm if it is true or not true.
Verizon uses a roaming selection termed as PRL=TRUE. What that means, is that in order for a CDMA phone to roam on another carrier&#039;s network, the other carrier must be specified in the PRL. If a CDMA signal is available, but not specified in the PRL, the phone will NOT acquire that CDMA signal thus, the user will be denied the ability to dial 911 in areas where there is no Verizon signal, but there is a alternative signal albeit Verizon does not have a roaming relationship with. I have just heard about it anedotally.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris&#8230;Here is one for you, which I have heard through rumors and I can not confirm if it is true or not true.</p><p>Verizon uses a roaming selection termed as PRL=TRUE. What that means, is that in order for a CDMA phone to roam on another carrier&#8217;s network, the other carrier must be specified in the PRL. If a CDMA signal is available, but not specified in the PRL, the phone will NOT acquire that CDMA signal thus, the user will be denied the ability to dial 911 in areas where there is no Verizon signal, but there is a alternative signal albeit Verizon does not have a roaming relationship with. I have just heard about it anedotally.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: T-Mobile G1 Update Contains Critical Exploit, Easy to Abuse &#124; PhoneNews.com</title><link>http://www.phonenews.com/verizon-fota-issues-persist-customer-council-objects-fcc-psaps-concerned-5250/#comment-22221</link> <dc:creator>T-Mobile G1 Update Contains Critical Exploit, Easy to Abuse &#124; PhoneNews.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 09:55:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonenews.com/?p=5250#comment-22221</guid> <description>[...] update also echos our previous coverage of Verizon&#8217;s FOTA implementation, which can be used to update devices without the [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] update also echos our previous coverage of Verizon&#8217;s FOTA implementation, which can be used to update devices without the [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
